ARA Freight Trends: Stable Surface, Structural Strain – A Market Caught Between Planning and Pressure

As May turned to June, the ARA barge freight market held its footing in a week that reflected both resilience and inertia. Amid moderate volumes, rates remained largely unchanged or declined slightly, particularly for middle distillates. However, behind the calm veneer, terminal delays, operational bottlenecks, and cautious forward planning continued to weigh heavily on fresh market engagement.


1. Freight Rates Drift with Minimal Adjustments

Across the reporting period, most freight rates remained flat or exhibited minor declines, depending on route and product:

  • Cross Harbor rates were among the few to experience light day-on-day erosion—from approximately €5.03/ton on May 30 to €4.85/ton by June 4.

  • Rates for Antwerp–Amsterdam and Ghent–Rotterdam also edged lower, with changes more pronounced for middle distillates than for light ends.

  • Notably, light ends rates remained exceptionally stable, with negligible changes throughout the week.

Takeaway: The market absorbed operational frictions without dramatic repricing, but subtle pressure on distillate rates hints at shifting product dynamics.


2. Terminal Delays and Infrastructure Headwinds Persist

A constant theme throughout the week was the continued strain on terminal logistics:

  • Reports indicated waiting times of up to three weeks at key hubs in Amsterdam and Antwerp, which constrained barge turnover and limited loading availability.

  • Even with this imbalance, pricing remained soft, as demand failed to match potential capacity utilization.

  • These delays led to a growing reliance on PJK B/L and lump sum basis deals, reducing transparency in rate discovery and impeding liquidity.

Takeaway: Freight economics remain subdued, not due to barge shortages, but because of persistent infrastructure drag and operational unpredictability.


3. Spot Volume Fluctuations Reflect Planning Over Pacing

Daily spot volumes oscillated, ranging from 46.4kton to 59.5kton, with the highest activity recorded on June 3.

  • May 30 and June 3 stood out for having the strongest transactional days, but this momentum was largely driven by clearing prior negotiations rather than new spikes in demand.

  • The first week of June also marked a shift toward forward bookings for the Pentecost weekend, with several players focusing on June deliveries rather than prompt execution.

Takeaway: Behind relatively healthy volumes lies a more conservative strategy: participants are pacing activity and reducing exposure, rather than ramping up flows.


4. Demand Remains Tepid Across Products

Even with active days, true spot demand was lackluster:

  • Reports highlighted a lack of urgency in product movements, especially in gasoline components and middle distillates.

  • Refinery disruptions—such as CDU outages at BP Rotterdam—added background tension but failed to materially lift barge demand.

Takeaway: Product availability is not the limiting factor—demand hesitancy and macroeconomic caution are holding the reins.


5. The Pricing Mix Shows Convergence

By the end of the week, the freight rate gap between different routes and products narrowed further:

  • Cross Harbor and Ghent–Amsterdam rates moved into closer proximity, suggesting margin compression across the region.

  • Meanwhile, deals often closed within tight bands (e.g., €6.60–€6.80 on Antwerp/Amsterdam routes), reinforcing the sense of a functionally flat market.

Takeaway: With rate spreads narrowing, arbitrage opportunities are becoming less attractive, reinforcing the conservative stance of most traders.


Conclusion: A Market in Standby Mode

This week’s ARA freight market has operated under a cloak of normalcy, yet the structural frictions remain unresolved. Terminal congestion, sluggish product demand, and a lack of pricing volatility all contribute to a freight environment that’s functioning, but far from flourishing.

Looking ahead, market participants will be watching for:

  • Terminal decongestion as a potential unlock for more agile freighting.

  • Post-Pentecost rebalancing, which may stimulate fresh spot demand.

  • Refinery operations and how outages or restarts shift the load mix.

Until then, the ARA barge market remains a case study in tactical patience and cautious logistics.

Contango on the Horizon? Navigating the Turning Tide in Oil Storage Economics

By Lars van Wageningen, Research & Consultancy Manager

May 2025 was marked by significant volatility in global oil markets, with Brent crude prices flirting with multi-year lows, forward curves flattening into contango, and trade flow disruptions affecting key hubs. While backwardation still defines the prompt structure, a deeper contango emerges beyond Q4 2025—a signal of shifting market fundamentals. For tank terminal operators, this environment demands strategic recalibration toward future storage plays, flexible infrastructure, and adaptive commercial models.


1. Price Weakness and Forward Curve Flattening

Brent crude hovered between $62.13 and $64.53/bbl throughout May, pressured by ongoing geopolitical uncertainty, OPEC+ supply increases, and a fragile macroeconomic outlook. On May 2, Brent dropped below $60/bbl, the lowest in four years, before modest rebounds later in the month.

Key trend: While spot prices stayed depressed, forward spreads gradually narrowed, and by mid May, Brent calendar spreads showed contango developing from 2026 onwards

Strategic takeaway: Terminal professionals should prepare for a shift from prompt-driven demand to future-oriented storage inquiries. This is a critical time to reassess contract structures and evaluate potential tank reconfiguration to align with longer-dated storage demand.


2. Storage Economics Still Underwater—But Signs of a Turn

Despite forward-looking contango, break-even storage rates remained negative across all products in May, especially gasoline and gasoil:

  • RBOB M1-M6: ranged from -€9.33 to -€10.07

  • Gasoil M1-M6: ranged from -€3.09 to -€3.52

  • Jet kerosene M1-M6: consistently around -€3.70 to -€3.91

The charts on page 3 across all reports confirm persistently unprofitable contango storage throughout May, despite some improvement in longer-term spreads.

Strategic takeaway: Tank terminals should remain focused on throughput services while preparing operationally for a potential contango play in 2026. Scenario planning for price curve shifts is no longer optional—it is essential.


3. Product Cracks Reveal Divergent Market Dynamics

Product crack spreads throughout May were a mixed bag:

  • Gasoline and HSFO saw support from tighting of the market due to export opportunities (gasoline) and and slowdown in imports (HSFO).

  • Middle distillates like diesel and jet fuel showed bearish tendencies as imports into Europe increased, but this can get under pressure due to a closed arb and slowdown in imports for June.

  • Cracking margins hovered between $8.03 and $11.62/bbl, with hydroskimming margins remaining negative throughout

According to page 9 commentary in the May 16 and May 30 reports, light ends benefitted from ARA exports to the US and Africa, while middle distillates suffered from inventory overhangs and closed arbs from Asia.

Strategic takeaway: As margins vary across the barrel, tank terminals must enhance product flexibility—supporting blending, switching, and short-term repurposing between distillates and gasoline pools.


4. Emerging Trade Flow Shifts and Demand Signals

May trade flow insights reveal significant structural adjustments:

  • Fuel oil: Increased regional demand for ULSFO in the Med and summer power generation demand in the Middle East and Egypt supported prices, yet arbs to Asia remained shut due to high transport costs and saturated markets.

  • Middle distillates: US distillate stocks rebounded but remain low, closing some export opportunities to Europe, while demand up the Rhine remained steady. Europe continued importing from Middle East and India to compensate for local refinery outages.

  • Gasoline: Export routes from ARA to North America and West Africa remained active, although at lower levels compared to previous years. Stocks in ARA dropped in early May but rebounded due to incoming cargoes and refining restarts.

Strategic takeaway: Trade imbalances are increasingly regional and seasonal, making it vital for tank terminals to adopt flexible scheduling and logistics management systems to match product flow shifts.


5. Market Sentiment Turning, but Not Yet Translated to Tank Economics

Forward curve outlooks across May consistently echoed a growing belief in storage demand growth from 2026. Spot backwardation remained intact but eroded slightly week-over-week.

  • The May 30 outlook noted the market was absorbing a 2.2mbpd surplus for now, but anticipated stock builds may trigger deeper contango later.

  • Calendar Spread Options (CSOs) for WTI crude Nov/Dec 2025 surged to $1.60–$2.00/cbm, reflecting early hedging and speculative positioning.

Strategic takeaway: Commercial teams at tank terminals must start engaging counterparties today for forward storage deals, especially with counterparties active in the CSO and futures market.


Conclusion: Ready for the Pivot

While the storage economics of May 2025 remain unfavorable, contango is creeping back—not yet at the front end, but visibly on the horizon. For tank terminals, this is the moment to:

  • Invest in future-proofing infrastructure

  • Increase contractual agility

  • Prioritize data-driven positioning strategies

The market is poised to pivot. Terminals that act on early signals—rather than waiting for headlines—will own the advantage in the next cycle.

Saudi’s refining boom helps it weather oil price war

 Saudi Arabia has been cranking up oil refining operations to capture strong profit margins, helping the kingdom offset revenue lost from declining crude prices and exports.

The world’s top oil exporter has in recent years invested heavily in expanding and modernizing its refining and petrochemical capacity at home and overseas to meet growing demand for fuel and plastics while also securing outlets for its crude oil.

Saudi Arabia has nine local refineries with a combined capacity of 3.33 million barrels of oil per day (bpd), accounting for roughly 3% of global demand, which are configured to process its domestically produced crude oil. It operates another 4.3 million bpd of refining capacity abroad, including in China, the United States and Malaysia.

The kingdom’s domestic refineries processed 2.94 million bpd in March, the highest-ever volume for that month and only a smidgen below the record high of 2.96 million bpd in April 2024, according to data from the Joint Organizations Data Initiative (JODI).

The 12% monthly increase in refining crude intake in March was 23% above the 10-year average for the same period. It correlates with a 12% month-on-month drop in Saudi crude exports to 5.75 million bpd in March, according to the data, highlighting the kingdom’s flexibility between directly selling crude to other refiners and refining it itself.

Saudi refinery rates likely declined by around 200,000 bpd in April due to planned plant maintenance, but should remain at elevated levels ahead of peak summer demand season, according to Keshav Lohiya, CEO and founder of analytics firm Oilytics.

Saudi’s refined product exports, which include diesel, gasoline, jet fuel and fuel oil, rose to a record 1.58 million bpd in March, before declining to 1.48 million bpd in April and 1.42 million bpd so far in May, according to data from ship tracking firm Kpler, likely reflecting refinery turnaround.

FLEXIBILITY

This integrated strategy offers Saudi Aramco (2222.SE), opens new tab, the country’s national oil company, an effective way to manage oil price volatility as refining margins – the profit made by processing crude oil into transportation fuels and chemicals – typically rise when feedstock prices decline.

By Ron Bousso / May 27, 2025

Mexico’s Pemex Swings to $2 Billion Loss as Production, Sales Slum

Pemex, Mexico’s heavily indebted state energy company, reported an 11.3% drop in first-quarter production of crude and condensate on Wednesday as falling sales and foreign-exchange losses contributed to a 43.3 billion peso ($2.12 billion) net loss.

In a filing with Mexico’s stock exchange, Pemex, one of Mexico’s largest companies, attributed the production slump to the decline of mature wells and delays in new well completions.

During the first quarter, Pemex and its partners pumped 1.62 million barrels per day (bpd) of crude oil and condensate. The company processed 936,000 bpd in its local refineries, down 5% compared to the year-ago period.

Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum has pledged to raise production to 1.8 million bpd, although older fields, particularly in the Gulf of Mexico, are being depleted and more recent discoveries have failed to compensate.

On a call with analysts, Pemex’s corporate planning chief, Jorge Alberto Aguilar, said the company was working to reach the 1.8-million-bpd goal by the end of the year and maintain it at that level.

Sheinbaum, who will govern until 2030, has said domestic crude production will ensure Mexico can produce the gasoline it needs and end its dependence on motor-fuel imports.

Production has been falling for several months. Pemex has not been within the government’s production target since March 2024, when it pumped 1.81 million bpd.

A series of contracts for joint ventures with private companies is being prepared to increase pumping, they added, noting that Pemex will have at least a 40% stake.

Revenue during the January-to-March period fell 2.5% to 395.59 billion pesos, mainly due to lower crude oil sales volumes, Pemex said.

Pemex said foreign-exchange losses and rising costs played roles in its swing to a net loss.

In the quarter, its refining unit yielded 305,000 bpd of gasoline and 171,000 bpd of diesel.

PEMEX AIMS TO REDUCE DEBT BALANCE

Pemex said its financial debt for the three-month period totaled $101.1 billion, up from the $97.6 billion reported in the fourth quarter of 2024.

Already the world’s most indebted energy company, Pemex has received billions of pesos in government support. The company said it received 80 billion pesos in government support in the first quarter.

The funds were mainly used to pay down debt. Pemex said its goal “is to reduce the financial debt balance over the course of the year, resulting in a lower balance at the end of 2025 versus the end of 2024.”

The company said that 136 billion pesos in transfers from the government were approved for amortizations.

Pemex also reported a decline in drilling activity, completing during the first quarter 12 development wells and five exploratory wells, down from 16 and eight wells, respectively, in the same period in 2024.

Executives of the state-owned giant did not mention on Wednesday whether the drop in well drilling levels had any relation to the debts to suppliers, which reached $19.9 billion at the quarter’s close.

In late 2023, local industry groups said Pemex’s ballooning debt to its oil service providers and private oil and gas producers was threatening hydrocarbon production and the survival of companies.

Executives said that Pemex will continue to make payments to suppliers and that it is working with the Finance Ministry to seek ways to manage financial and commercial liabilities.

By: Reuters / May 06, 2025.

European refining margins lagging, more closures expected?

As of April 2025, Europe’s refining industry is navigating a landscape of further diminishing margins, influenced by a combination of economic pressures, policy shifts, and global competition. This downturn is prompting significant strategic adjustments within the sector, which is already coping with various closures seen in the past months and more to come for 2025 and beyond.

Current State of European Refining Margins

In 2024, European refining margins experienced a notable decline. Northwest Europe’s ultra-low sulphur diesel margins, for instance, decreased from $42 per barrel in 2022 to $29.71 per barrel in 2023. Its cracking margins remained on low levels during 2023 and 2024 which means the region could no longer remain competitive compared to other key regions. This downward trend is also attributed to factors such as reduced local European demand due to the energy transition and electrification, increasing competition from new refineries worldwide, and elevated operating costs stemming from stricter emissions regulations. ​

Potential Consequences

The sustained pressure on margins is leading to significant restructuring. For example, ExxonMobil announced plans to downsize operations at its Port-Jerome complex in France while BP is scaling back its Gelsenkirchen refinery in Germany by a third (and open for interested buyers to acquire the facility). Ineos will shut down its Grangemouth refining this spring and Shell has turned off the crude distillation units at its Rheinland Wesseling site in March, which could drop total refining capacity in the Northwest European region by 650.000 bpd. This could weaken the European competitiveness of the region and increases its reliance on imports from other regions, increasing vulnerability to and volatility of prices, product availability and importance of the supply chain.

The introduction of tariffs and changing trade policies are reshaping global oil flows. European refiners may find opportunities in markets previously dominated by U.S. exports, but also face heightened competition from new refineries in regions like West Africa (Nigeria, Angola) and Latin America (Mexico, Argentina). This is already leading to a downturn in gasoline export out of key hubs in ARA and a steady flow of (more cost-effective) jet fuel from Nigeria’s Dangote refinery to the US Gulf Coast.

European refiners are increasingly investing in renewable energy projects to align with the energy transition. However, falling profits are testing the viability of these green initiatives, with various projects facing delays or cancellations due to economic constraints. ​The latest examples include postponing SAF production by BP in its Spanish refinery and various (green) hydrogen initiatives in the region.

In conclusion, Europe’s refining sector is at a pivotal juncture, contending with declining margins and the obligation to adapt to a rapidly evolving global energy landscape.  Strategic decisions made now will be crucial in determining the future resilience and competitiveness of the industry.

Barge volumes, prices, & disruption: navigating the impact of NW Europe refinery closures

Refinery closures in North-West Europe are triggering significant shifts across the liquid bulk supply chain. With capacity reductions and structural changes taking place, market participants are facing growing uncertainty in product availability, trade flows, and barge utilization.

Clean ammonia market outlook: risks, realities, and infrastructure opportunities

By Patrick Kulsen, CEO, Insights Global

As the global push for decarbonization accelerates, clean ammonia has emerged as one of the most promising hydrogen carriers. Yet, beneath the optimism lies a complex and uneven market landscape—especially for those in the tank terminal industry.

During the Clean Ammonia Storage Conference in March 2025, we shared critical insights on the current state and future of clean ammonia, with a focus on storage dynamics. Here’s what tank terminal professionals need to know now.

Clean ammonia today: trade is decreasing

Ammonia is primarily used in fertilizer production—but clean ammonia (produced with renewable energy or low-carbon hydrogen) is increasingly eyed for applications in power generation, shipping fuel, and as a key enabler of the hydrogen economy.

Global demand has remained stable, with significant import needs across Asia, North-Africa, Europe, and North America. Independent storage infrastructure is still small compared to global trade of 15Mton. Our research shows that current global ammonia tank terminal capacity sits at approximately 1.35 million cbm, with Europe holding the largest share.

Trade flows are evolving—but terminal readiness is uneven

Ammonia trade flows remain concentrated, with major exports from countries like Trinidad and Tobago, Saudi Arabia, and Indonesia. Imports are dominated by India, Morocco, and the U.S.. This concerns mainly gray ammonia, produced from fossil fuels. The big promise is the development of green ammonia supply chains as part of the energy transition.

However, many planned terminal projects, aimed at facilitating these green ammonia flows, remain in early development stages—often lacking final investment decisions (FIDs), clear start dates, or capacity details. According to plans a wave of projects will come online between 2026 and 2030, adding at least 0.9 million cbm of capacity, particularly in Europe.

Market headwinds: Project realization rates are low

Despite aggressive decarbonization goals, less than 10% of green ammonia and hydrogen projects have been realized so far. Why? High production costs, limited offtake commitments, and an overall lack of willingness to pay premium prices.

Adding to the challenging investment environment is the recently installed Trump administration which is reshuffling priorities away from the energy transition to “drill-baby-drill”.

For tank terminal stakeholders, this translates into uncertainty—but also opportunity. The market may be slower than hoped or go in other directions, but those who anticipate infrastructure needs now stand to benefit most when momentum returns.

What’s next for tank terminals?

Terminal operators should carefully monitor developments in:

  • Green corridors for maritime shipping

  • Industrial hubs planning hydrogen/ammonia integration

  • Emerging regulations supporting clean fuel mandates

Storage players with flexibility and the ability to scale quickly will be best positioned to support the evolving ammonia supply chain.

Get the tools to stay ahead

At TankTerminals.com, we track ammonia terminal projects worldwide—planned, operational, and everything in between. Our platform gives professionals a data-driven edge in planning, benchmarking, and opportunity spotting.

👉 Start your free trial today and see how our research tool can support your ammonia market strategy.

Europe Eyes Flexible Storage Goals After Cold Snap Squeeze

Europe’s natural gas prices have declined in recent weeks after hitting a two-year high in February, easing concerns about the price Europe will have to pay this summer to prepare for the next winter.

Dutch TTF Natural Gas Futures, the benchmark for Europe’s gas trading, hit a two-year high in the middle of February amid the first proper winter with prolonged periods of cold snaps since the 2022 energy crisis.

Prices have retreated since mid-February as the heating season and winter are coming to an end, and solar and wind power generation is picking up to regain some share of the European power generation mix, following prolonged periods of wind speed lulls and little sunshine in Europe during the winter.

The recent decline in natural gas prices in Europe could also offer some relief to power prices, which have remained high this winter on the back of the high natural gas price.

Europe’s energy-intensive industry, however, continues to suffer from the high energy prices and calls for additional measures to address the high energy costs, which put the European industry at a disadvantage.

The first proper winter in Europe, with prolonged periods of cold snaps since the 2022 energy crisis, depleted the EU stockpiles of natural gas.

As a result, European prices rallied by mid-February, and concerns emerged about the need for much more additional LNG supply to make its way to Europe to help with the storage refill before the next winter begins.

But prices have eased over the past few weeks, as talks began on a potential Russia-Ukraine ceasefire and as the winter in the northern hemisphere is coming to an end. The EU leaders are also discussing making the EU targets for gas storage refill by November 1 more flexible, which could ease some of the concerns about the pace of refills from April onwards.

A group of EU member states, including the biggest economies Germany and France, are reportedly arguing that to avoid price spikes and market speculation, the bloc should allow more flexibility in its currently binding 90% full-storage target by November 1 each year.  

In the wake of the 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine and the halt to Russian pipeline gas supply to most EU countries, the European Commission adopted a target for EU natural gas storage levels to be 90% full by November 1 of each year.

However, this rigid November 1 target has created problems for many market players. Policymakers in countries including Germany, Italy, and the Netherlands are concerned that the current high forward gas prices for the summer months would make it unprofitable for gas companies and marketers to store gas.

With EU storage depleted at the fastest pace in seven years after a cold winter, the summer refill season presents several challenges in availability, prices, and the money that Europe will have to spend on additional LNG.

At a meeting last week, some EU energy ministers “mentioned the need for flexibility as regards the proposed gas storage regulation, which is currently being discussed, as well as for a rigorous impact assessment of the rules,” the EU said.

Despite the possible easing of the refill targets, the gas market will remain tight in the coming months, Moutaz Altaghlibi, senior energy economist at ABN AMRO Bank, said last week.

Geopolitics, including U.S. tariff and trade policy and the Russia-Ukraine peace talks, will continue to be the main driver of volatility, ABN AMRO reckons.

“At the same time, the market will be watchful of the speed of storage refill, while it remains responsive to factors affecting demand in Europe or key LNG competitors in Asia, such as adverse weather conditions, along with any supply disruptions from key suppliers such Norway or the US,” Altaghlibi noted.

The first proper winter in Europe, with prolonged periods of cold snaps since the 2022 energy crisis, depleted the EU stockpiles of natural gas.

As a result, European prices rallied by mid-February, and concerns emerged about the need for much more additional LNG supply to make its way to Europe to help with the storage refill before the next winter begins.

But prices have eased over the past few weeks, as talks began on a potential Russia-Ukraine ceasefire and as the winter in the northern hemisphere is coming to an end. The EU leaders are also discussing making the EU targets for gas storage refill by November 1 more flexible, which could ease some of the concerns about the pace of refills from April onwards.

A group of EU member states, including the biggest economies Germany and France, are reportedly arguing that to avoid price spikes and market speculation, the bloc should allow more flexibility in its currently binding 90% full-storage target by November 1 each year.  }

In the wake of the 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine and the halt to Russian pipeline gas supply to most EU countries, the European Commission adopted a target for EU natural gas storage levels to be 90% full by November 1 of each year.

However, this rigid November 1 target has created problems for many market players. Policymakers in countries including Germany, Italy, and the Netherlands are concerned that the current high forward gas prices for the summer months would make it unprofitable for gas companies and marketers to store gas.

With EU storage depleted at the fastest pace in seven years after a cold winter, the summer refill season presents several challenges in availability, prices, and the money that Europe will have to spend on additional LNG.

At a meeting last week, some EU energy ministers “mentioned the need for flexibility as regards the proposed gas storage regulation, which is currently being discussed, as well as for a rigorous impact assessment of the rules,” the EU said.

Despite the possible easing of the refill targets, the gas market will remain tight in the coming months, Moutaz Altaghlibi, senior energy economist at ABN AMRO Bank, said last week.

By Tsvetana Paraskova – Mar 24, 2025.

Terminal operator demands lease extension

ISLAMABAD: Engro Vopak Terminal Limited (EVTL) has pressed the government to extend the lease of land for a liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) and liquid chemical terminal at Port Qasim to enable it to continue operations.

The government had allocated a piece of land to EVTL at Port Qasim in 1995 and its lease is going to expire in 2026. Now, EVTL is urging the government to extend the lease. However, the Ministry of Maritime Affairs has refused to extend the lease and plans to float a tender for a fresh lease.

EVTL claims it has spent $100 million and intends to continue investing in the project if the government extends the lease agreement.

Interestingly, the extension in lease is not part of the agreement; therefore the maritime affairs ministry is reluctant to endorse it.

Sources said that the Port Qasim Authority (PQA) could not extend the lease of land and it would have to float a tender under the Public Procurement Regulatory Authority (PPRA) rules.

Besides the LPG and liquid chemical terminal, a liquefied natural gas (LNG) pipeline also passes through this land that connects an LNG terminal owned by Engro with Sui Southern Gas Company’s network.

Sources said that the matter was taken up in a recent meeting of the Special Investment Facilitation Council (SIFC). The SIFC had set a deadline for the Petroleum Division to complete negotiations with EVTL.

The PQA informed the government about the initiation of another round of negotiations with EVTL by signing the second Supplemental Implementation Agreement on January 15, 2025.

It emphasised that a third-party business valuation of the terminal was necessary, which required additional time. The PQA was of the view that the deadline of January 31, 2025 could not be met due to the extensive due diligence required in the process.

It requested an extension in the deadline to assist in the independent valuation of assets. The government granted extension of another 30 days (until March 2) for finalising ongoing negotiations with EVTL through signing the third Supplemental Agreement. It decided that the Finance Division would facilitate the PQA by providing services for the independent evaluation of assets.

The EVTL terminal for bulk liquid chemicals and LPG is part of Vopak’s global network of 78 terminals across 23 countries with total capacity of 36.2 million cubic metres. A joint venture between Royal Vopak (the Netherlands) and Engro Corporation, it has provided storage and terminal services since 1997. Engro Vopak handles over 50% of Pakistan’s LPG marine imports and supports major chemical industries by delivering key products like phosphoric acid, paraxylene and ethylene. Its LPG storage capacity had been expanded to 6,700 MT in 2012, with total storage now at 82,400 cubic metres.


By: Zafar Bhutta / March 02, 2025

S&P: Energy Cleantech Spending to Outpace Oil and Gas

A report from S&P Global Commodity Insights looks at clean energy technology trends for 2025.

It predicts a transformative year for the cleantech sector with investments outpacing fossil fuels for the first time.

Edurne Zoco, Executive Director of Clean Energy Technology at S&P Global Commodity Insights, says: “S&P Global Commodity Insights forecasts that cleantech energy supply investments, including renewable power generation, green hydrogen production and carbon capture and storage (CCS), will reach US$670bn in 2025, marking the first time these investments will outpace projected upstream oil and gas spending.

“Solar PV is expected to represent half of all cleantech investments and two-thirds of installed megawatts.”

Supply chain tensions and rebalancing

The cleantech sector is experiencing a saturation of Chinese-manufactured equipment, affecting the global pricing structure within the solar, wind and battery domains.

Despite potential price stabilisation by 2025, Chinese competition is slated to maintain low market prices.

Nonetheless, a rebalancing act is anticipated, with projections suggesting a decline in China’s market share in PV module production to 65% and battery cell manufacturing to 61% by 2030.

This evolution presents both challenges and opportunities, demanding strategic foresight from supply chain professionals.

The importance of battery energy storage is becoming increasingly significant in enhancing the economics of projects within regions with substantial penetration of renewable energy.

Effective integration of battery storage solutions is essential for managing both viability and price volatility in renewable projects.

AI’s impact on clean energy supply chains

Clearly, AI is transforming the cleantech sector, particularly in forecasting and grid planning. 

Eduard Sala de Vedruna, Head of Research, Energy Transition, Sustainability & Services at S&P Global Commodity Insights, explains: “The new year is not only bringing to the clean energy sector significant transformations that are reshaping energy production and consumption, but it promises to be pivotal for the clean energy sector, with significant advancements in corporate clean energy procurement and the integration of AI in energy management.”

AI-powered applications are emerging as critical tools for risk mitigation in energy supply chains, addressing discrepancies between forecast and actual energy generation.

Data centres are also expected to play a more significant role.

Expected to source approximately 300 TWh of clean power annually by 2030, they are becoming pivotal in driving demand for renewable energy, especially in North America.

Decarbonisation and supply chain innovation

The pursuit of deep decarbonisation is requiring innovation across the supply chains.

With ammonia increasingly becoming fundamental to low-carbon hydrogen production and the CCS sector on track to secure significant CO₂ capture capacity by 2025, the cleantech sector is poised for considerable advancements.

For supply chain managers, staying abreast of these developments is crucial for navigating the complexities of the ongoing energy transition effectively.

By Jasmin Jessen, Energy Digital / February 17, 2025

Insights Global / PJK International successfully completed 2nd independent assurance review of ARA CPP and Rhine Barge Freight Rate benchmark prices

Insights Global / PJK International has successfully concluded its second external assurance review of its benchmark prices for ARA CPP and Rhine Barge Freight Rates.

The independent review, conducted by an external auditing firm, assessed the policies and processes used by Insights Global / PJK International to evaluate oil product transportation costs via inland barges in Northwest Europe.

These policies and processes were developed in alignment with the Principles for Price Reporting Agencies (PRAs) established by the International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) in October 2012.

Recognized by the G20 in November 2012, the IOSCO PRA Principles have been incorporated into the EU Benchmark Regulation (BMR).

These principles set comprehensive standards for governance, quality, integrity, control, and conflict management for commodity benchmark price assessments.

Compliance with these standards requires annual external audits. Insights Global’s price assessment methodologies and policies are available here.

The audit report can be provided upon request.