ARA Freight Market: Volume Swings, Rate Drops, and Summer Stillness

The ARA clean petroleum product (CPP) barge market ended July with declining freight rates, volatile demand, and mounting evidence of a seasonal slowdown. Despite a midweek recovery in spot volumes, overall sentiment remained cautious as traders faced high barge availability, logistical ease, and little pricing incentive to move product.


1. Freight Rates: Downward Pressure Persists

Freight rates declined across the board during the week, especially toward the end:

  • On 29 July, rates for all ARA destinations and product groups dropped, with corrections of up to 0.21 €/ton observed for Cross Harbor and Rotterdam–Antwerp/Amsterdam routes.

  • This continued a broader trend seen since 24 July, when rates for both middle distillates and light ends began falling due to oversupply and low spot demand.

  • Only light ends on 25 July showed a brief uptick, with minor increases reported on several routes—likely due to end-of-week repositioning.

Takeaway: Freight pricing remains under structural pressure, with brief rebounds quickly overridden by systemic softness.


2. Spot Volumes: Highs and Lows in Equal Measure

Daily volumes ranged dramatically, reflecting a fragmented demand pattern:

  • A peak of 75.3 kton on 22 July represented a strong start to the week.

  • This was followed by steady declines, with only 13 kton reported on 29 July, the lowest daily total since early June.

  • Light ends led early-week activity, while middle distillates remained subdued throughout—despite refinery restarts and limited availability issues.

Takeaway: There’s activity—but it’s erratic, reactive, and product-specific rather than trend-driven.


3. Operational Environment: Ample Barges, Fewer Delays

For most of the period, the logistics environment remained frictionless:

  • No major terminal delays were reported, with previous bottlenecks at Eurotank Amsterdam and Ghent largely resolved.

  • That said, barges remained underutilized, and several freighters reported idle vessels, particularly in the large-size segment (>4000 DWT).

  • Many fixtures were closed on a PJK B/L or lump sum basis, as parties tried to preserve flexibility in the face of demand unpredictability.

Takeaway: It’s not infrastructure holding back activity—it’s a lack of commercial pull.


4. Product Dynamics: Light Ends Offer Some Resilience

Light ends consistently outperformed middle distillates:

  • Even during quieter trading days, light ends saw more deals closed, and freight rates held up better.

  • Meanwhile, backwardation in gasoil and low inland demand continued to suppress middle distillate flows ex-ARA.

Takeaway: Gasoline and components are the relative bright spot, but not enough to lift the whole market.


5. Outlook: End-of-Month Stillness, Limited Forward Visibility

As July ended, market players were clearly in wait-and-see mode:

  • Forward interest was weak, especially with August holidays approaching.

  • High Rhine water levels and strong backwardation meant few Rhine-bound volumes, leaving ARA congested with both barges and products.

  • Traders and operators alike are managing day-to-day, with minimal speculative positioning.

Takeaway: Unless regional arbitrage opens or macro fundamentals shift, ARA freight rates are likely to remain subdued into early August.


What’s next?

Are you ready to face your challenges head-on?

We now offer a FREE customized trial to our BargeINSIGHTS tool, an all-in-one platform for liquid bulk barge transport optimization.

With BargeINSIGHTS, you get instant insights into barge freight rates, bunker gas oil prices, water levels, vessel tracking, and barge availability—all in one place. No more time-consuming data collection; everything you need is at your fingertips.

Click here to schedule your demo and get access to BargeINSIGHTS for free!

ARA Freight Trends: Stable Surface, Structural Strain – A Market Caught Between Planning and Pressure

As May turned to June, the ARA barge freight market held its footing in a week that reflected both resilience and inertia. Amid moderate volumes, rates remained largely unchanged or declined slightly, particularly for middle distillates. However, behind the calm veneer, terminal delays, operational bottlenecks, and cautious forward planning continued to weigh heavily on fresh market engagement.


1. Freight Rates Drift with Minimal Adjustments

Across the reporting period, most freight rates remained flat or exhibited minor declines, depending on route and product:

  • Cross Harbor rates were among the few to experience light day-on-day erosion—from approximately €5.03/ton on May 30 to €4.85/ton by June 4.

  • Rates for Antwerp–Amsterdam and Ghent–Rotterdam also edged lower, with changes more pronounced for middle distillates than for light ends.

  • Notably, light ends rates remained exceptionally stable, with negligible changes throughout the week.

Takeaway: The market absorbed operational frictions without dramatic repricing, but subtle pressure on distillate rates hints at shifting product dynamics.


2. Terminal Delays and Infrastructure Headwinds Persist

A constant theme throughout the week was the continued strain on terminal logistics:

  • Reports indicated waiting times of up to three weeks at key hubs in Amsterdam and Antwerp, which constrained barge turnover and limited loading availability.

  • Even with this imbalance, pricing remained soft, as demand failed to match potential capacity utilization.

  • These delays led to a growing reliance on PJK B/L and lump sum basis deals, reducing transparency in rate discovery and impeding liquidity.

Takeaway: Freight economics remain subdued, not due to barge shortages, but because of persistent infrastructure drag and operational unpredictability.


3. Spot Volume Fluctuations Reflect Planning Over Pacing

Daily spot volumes oscillated, ranging from 46.4kton to 59.5kton, with the highest activity recorded on June 3.

  • May 30 and June 3 stood out for having the strongest transactional days, but this momentum was largely driven by clearing prior negotiations rather than new spikes in demand.

  • The first week of June also marked a shift toward forward bookings for the Pentecost weekend, with several players focusing on June deliveries rather than prompt execution.

Takeaway: Behind relatively healthy volumes lies a more conservative strategy: participants are pacing activity and reducing exposure, rather than ramping up flows.


4. Demand Remains Tepid Across Products

Even with active days, true spot demand was lackluster:

  • Reports highlighted a lack of urgency in product movements, especially in gasoline components and middle distillates.

  • Refinery disruptions—such as CDU outages at BP Rotterdam—added background tension but failed to materially lift barge demand.

Takeaway: Product availability is not the limiting factor—demand hesitancy and macroeconomic caution are holding the reins.


5. The Pricing Mix Shows Convergence

By the end of the week, the freight rate gap between different routes and products narrowed further:

  • Cross Harbor and Ghent–Amsterdam rates moved into closer proximity, suggesting margin compression across the region.

  • Meanwhile, deals often closed within tight bands (e.g., €6.60–€6.80 on Antwerp/Amsterdam routes), reinforcing the sense of a functionally flat market.

Takeaway: With rate spreads narrowing, arbitrage opportunities are becoming less attractive, reinforcing the conservative stance of most traders.


Conclusion: A Market in Standby Mode

This week’s ARA freight market has operated under a cloak of normalcy, yet the structural frictions remain unresolved. Terminal congestion, sluggish product demand, and a lack of pricing volatility all contribute to a freight environment that’s functioning, but far from flourishing.

Looking ahead, market participants will be watching for:

  • Terminal decongestion as a potential unlock for more agile freighting.

  • Post-Pentecost rebalancing, which may stimulate fresh spot demand.

  • Refinery operations and how outages or restarts shift the load mix.

Until then, the ARA barge market remains a case study in tactical patience and cautious logistics.

Contango on the Horizon? Navigating the Turning Tide in Oil Storage Economics

By Lars van Wageningen, Research & Consultancy Manager

May 2025 was marked by significant volatility in global oil markets, with Brent crude prices flirting with multi-year lows, forward curves flattening into contango, and trade flow disruptions affecting key hubs. While backwardation still defines the prompt structure, a deeper contango emerges beyond Q4 2025—a signal of shifting market fundamentals. For tank terminal operators, this environment demands strategic recalibration toward future storage plays, flexible infrastructure, and adaptive commercial models.


1. Price Weakness and Forward Curve Flattening

Brent crude hovered between $62.13 and $64.53/bbl throughout May, pressured by ongoing geopolitical uncertainty, OPEC+ supply increases, and a fragile macroeconomic outlook. On May 2, Brent dropped below $60/bbl, the lowest in four years, before modest rebounds later in the month.

Key trend: While spot prices stayed depressed, forward spreads gradually narrowed, and by mid May, Brent calendar spreads showed contango developing from 2026 onwards

Strategic takeaway: Terminal professionals should prepare for a shift from prompt-driven demand to future-oriented storage inquiries. This is a critical time to reassess contract structures and evaluate potential tank reconfiguration to align with longer-dated storage demand.


2. Storage Economics Still Underwater—But Signs of a Turn

Despite forward-looking contango, break-even storage rates remained negative across all products in May, especially gasoline and gasoil:

  • RBOB M1-M6: ranged from -€9.33 to -€10.07

  • Gasoil M1-M6: ranged from -€3.09 to -€3.52

  • Jet kerosene M1-M6: consistently around -€3.70 to -€3.91

The charts on page 3 across all reports confirm persistently unprofitable contango storage throughout May, despite some improvement in longer-term spreads.

Strategic takeaway: Tank terminals should remain focused on throughput services while preparing operationally for a potential contango play in 2026. Scenario planning for price curve shifts is no longer optional—it is essential.


3. Product Cracks Reveal Divergent Market Dynamics

Product crack spreads throughout May were a mixed bag:

  • Gasoline and HSFO saw support from tighting of the market due to export opportunities (gasoline) and and slowdown in imports (HSFO).

  • Middle distillates like diesel and jet fuel showed bearish tendencies as imports into Europe increased, but this can get under pressure due to a closed arb and slowdown in imports for June.

  • Cracking margins hovered between $8.03 and $11.62/bbl, with hydroskimming margins remaining negative throughout

According to page 9 commentary in the May 16 and May 30 reports, light ends benefitted from ARA exports to the US and Africa, while middle distillates suffered from inventory overhangs and closed arbs from Asia.

Strategic takeaway: As margins vary across the barrel, tank terminals must enhance product flexibility—supporting blending, switching, and short-term repurposing between distillates and gasoline pools.


4. Emerging Trade Flow Shifts and Demand Signals

May trade flow insights reveal significant structural adjustments:

  • Fuel oil: Increased regional demand for ULSFO in the Med and summer power generation demand in the Middle East and Egypt supported prices, yet arbs to Asia remained shut due to high transport costs and saturated markets.

  • Middle distillates: US distillate stocks rebounded but remain low, closing some export opportunities to Europe, while demand up the Rhine remained steady. Europe continued importing from Middle East and India to compensate for local refinery outages.

  • Gasoline: Export routes from ARA to North America and West Africa remained active, although at lower levels compared to previous years. Stocks in ARA dropped in early May but rebounded due to incoming cargoes and refining restarts.

Strategic takeaway: Trade imbalances are increasingly regional and seasonal, making it vital for tank terminals to adopt flexible scheduling and logistics management systems to match product flow shifts.


5. Market Sentiment Turning, but Not Yet Translated to Tank Economics

Forward curve outlooks across May consistently echoed a growing belief in storage demand growth from 2026. Spot backwardation remained intact but eroded slightly week-over-week.

  • The May 30 outlook noted the market was absorbing a 2.2mbpd surplus for now, but anticipated stock builds may trigger deeper contango later.

  • Calendar Spread Options (CSOs) for WTI crude Nov/Dec 2025 surged to $1.60–$2.00/cbm, reflecting early hedging and speculative positioning.

Strategic takeaway: Commercial teams at tank terminals must start engaging counterparties today for forward storage deals, especially with counterparties active in the CSO and futures market.


Conclusion: Ready for the Pivot

While the storage economics of May 2025 remain unfavorable, contango is creeping back—not yet at the front end, but visibly on the horizon. For tank terminals, this is the moment to:

  • Invest in future-proofing infrastructure

  • Increase contractual agility

  • Prioritize data-driven positioning strategies

The market is poised to pivot. Terminals that act on early signals—rather than waiting for headlines—will own the advantage in the next cycle.

European refining margins lagging, more closures expected?

As of April 2025, Europe’s refining industry is navigating a landscape of further diminishing margins, influenced by a combination of economic pressures, policy shifts, and global competition. This downturn is prompting significant strategic adjustments within the sector, which is already coping with various closures seen in the past months and more to come for 2025 and beyond.

Current State of European Refining Margins

In 2024, European refining margins experienced a notable decline. Northwest Europe’s ultra-low sulphur diesel margins, for instance, decreased from $42 per barrel in 2022 to $29.71 per barrel in 2023. Its cracking margins remained on low levels during 2023 and 2024 which means the region could no longer remain competitive compared to other key regions. This downward trend is also attributed to factors such as reduced local European demand due to the energy transition and electrification, increasing competition from new refineries worldwide, and elevated operating costs stemming from stricter emissions regulations. ​

Potential Consequences

The sustained pressure on margins is leading to significant restructuring. For example, ExxonMobil announced plans to downsize operations at its Port-Jerome complex in France while BP is scaling back its Gelsenkirchen refinery in Germany by a third (and open for interested buyers to acquire the facility). Ineos will shut down its Grangemouth refining this spring and Shell has turned off the crude distillation units at its Rheinland Wesseling site in March, which could drop total refining capacity in the Northwest European region by 650.000 bpd. This could weaken the European competitiveness of the region and increases its reliance on imports from other regions, increasing vulnerability to and volatility of prices, product availability and importance of the supply chain.

The introduction of tariffs and changing trade policies are reshaping global oil flows. European refiners may find opportunities in markets previously dominated by U.S. exports, but also face heightened competition from new refineries in regions like West Africa (Nigeria, Angola) and Latin America (Mexico, Argentina). This is already leading to a downturn in gasoline export out of key hubs in ARA and a steady flow of (more cost-effective) jet fuel from Nigeria’s Dangote refinery to the US Gulf Coast.

European refiners are increasingly investing in renewable energy projects to align with the energy transition. However, falling profits are testing the viability of these green initiatives, with various projects facing delays or cancellations due to economic constraints. ​The latest examples include postponing SAF production by BP in its Spanish refinery and various (green) hydrogen initiatives in the region.

In conclusion, Europe’s refining sector is at a pivotal juncture, contending with declining margins and the obligation to adapt to a rapidly evolving global energy landscape.  Strategic decisions made now will be crucial in determining the future resilience and competitiveness of the industry.

Barge volumes, prices, & disruption: navigating the impact of NW Europe refinery closures

Refinery closures in North-West Europe are triggering significant shifts across the liquid bulk supply chain. With capacity reductions and structural changes taking place, market participants are facing growing uncertainty in product availability, trade flows, and barge utilization.

Clean ammonia market outlook: risks, realities, and infrastructure opportunities

By Patrick Kulsen, CEO, Insights Global

As the global push for decarbonization accelerates, clean ammonia has emerged as one of the most promising hydrogen carriers. Yet, beneath the optimism lies a complex and uneven market landscape—especially for those in the tank terminal industry.

During the Clean Ammonia Storage Conference in March 2025, we shared critical insights on the current state and future of clean ammonia, with a focus on storage dynamics. Here’s what tank terminal professionals need to know now.

Clean ammonia today: trade is decreasing

Ammonia is primarily used in fertilizer production—but clean ammonia (produced with renewable energy or low-carbon hydrogen) is increasingly eyed for applications in power generation, shipping fuel, and as a key enabler of the hydrogen economy.

Global demand has remained stable, with significant import needs across Asia, North-Africa, Europe, and North America. Independent storage infrastructure is still small compared to global trade of 15Mton. Our research shows that current global ammonia tank terminal capacity sits at approximately 1.35 million cbm, with Europe holding the largest share.

Trade flows are evolving—but terminal readiness is uneven

Ammonia trade flows remain concentrated, with major exports from countries like Trinidad and Tobago, Saudi Arabia, and Indonesia. Imports are dominated by India, Morocco, and the U.S.. This concerns mainly gray ammonia, produced from fossil fuels. The big promise is the development of green ammonia supply chains as part of the energy transition.

However, many planned terminal projects, aimed at facilitating these green ammonia flows, remain in early development stages—often lacking final investment decisions (FIDs), clear start dates, or capacity details. According to plans a wave of projects will come online between 2026 and 2030, adding at least 0.9 million cbm of capacity, particularly in Europe.

Market headwinds: Project realization rates are low

Despite aggressive decarbonization goals, less than 10% of green ammonia and hydrogen projects have been realized so far. Why? High production costs, limited offtake commitments, and an overall lack of willingness to pay premium prices.

Adding to the challenging investment environment is the recently installed Trump administration which is reshuffling priorities away from the energy transition to “drill-baby-drill”.

For tank terminal stakeholders, this translates into uncertainty—but also opportunity. The market may be slower than hoped or go in other directions, but those who anticipate infrastructure needs now stand to benefit most when momentum returns.

What’s next for tank terminals?

Terminal operators should carefully monitor developments in:

  • Green corridors for maritime shipping

  • Industrial hubs planning hydrogen/ammonia integration

  • Emerging regulations supporting clean fuel mandates

Storage players with flexibility and the ability to scale quickly will be best positioned to support the evolving ammonia supply chain.

Get the tools to stay ahead

At TankTerminals.com, we track ammonia terminal projects worldwide—planned, operational, and everything in between. Our platform gives professionals a data-driven edge in planning, benchmarking, and opportunity spotting.

👉 Start your free trial today and see how our research tool can support your ammonia market strategy.

Europe Eyes Flexible Storage Goals After Cold Snap Squeeze

Europe’s natural gas prices have declined in recent weeks after hitting a two-year high in February, easing concerns about the price Europe will have to pay this summer to prepare for the next winter.

Dutch TTF Natural Gas Futures, the benchmark for Europe’s gas trading, hit a two-year high in the middle of February amid the first proper winter with prolonged periods of cold snaps since the 2022 energy crisis.

Prices have retreated since mid-February as the heating season and winter are coming to an end, and solar and wind power generation is picking up to regain some share of the European power generation mix, following prolonged periods of wind speed lulls and little sunshine in Europe during the winter.

The recent decline in natural gas prices in Europe could also offer some relief to power prices, which have remained high this winter on the back of the high natural gas price.

Europe’s energy-intensive industry, however, continues to suffer from the high energy prices and calls for additional measures to address the high energy costs, which put the European industry at a disadvantage.

The first proper winter in Europe, with prolonged periods of cold snaps since the 2022 energy crisis, depleted the EU stockpiles of natural gas.

As a result, European prices rallied by mid-February, and concerns emerged about the need for much more additional LNG supply to make its way to Europe to help with the storage refill before the next winter begins.

But prices have eased over the past few weeks, as talks began on a potential Russia-Ukraine ceasefire and as the winter in the northern hemisphere is coming to an end. The EU leaders are also discussing making the EU targets for gas storage refill by November 1 more flexible, which could ease some of the concerns about the pace of refills from April onwards.

A group of EU member states, including the biggest economies Germany and France, are reportedly arguing that to avoid price spikes and market speculation, the bloc should allow more flexibility in its currently binding 90% full-storage target by November 1 each year.  

In the wake of the 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine and the halt to Russian pipeline gas supply to most EU countries, the European Commission adopted a target for EU natural gas storage levels to be 90% full by November 1 of each year.

However, this rigid November 1 target has created problems for many market players. Policymakers in countries including Germany, Italy, and the Netherlands are concerned that the current high forward gas prices for the summer months would make it unprofitable for gas companies and marketers to store gas.

With EU storage depleted at the fastest pace in seven years after a cold winter, the summer refill season presents several challenges in availability, prices, and the money that Europe will have to spend on additional LNG.

At a meeting last week, some EU energy ministers “mentioned the need for flexibility as regards the proposed gas storage regulation, which is currently being discussed, as well as for a rigorous impact assessment of the rules,” the EU said.

Despite the possible easing of the refill targets, the gas market will remain tight in the coming months, Moutaz Altaghlibi, senior energy economist at ABN AMRO Bank, said last week.

Geopolitics, including U.S. tariff and trade policy and the Russia-Ukraine peace talks, will continue to be the main driver of volatility, ABN AMRO reckons.

“At the same time, the market will be watchful of the speed of storage refill, while it remains responsive to factors affecting demand in Europe or key LNG competitors in Asia, such as adverse weather conditions, along with any supply disruptions from key suppliers such Norway or the US,” Altaghlibi noted.

The first proper winter in Europe, with prolonged periods of cold snaps since the 2022 energy crisis, depleted the EU stockpiles of natural gas.

As a result, European prices rallied by mid-February, and concerns emerged about the need for much more additional LNG supply to make its way to Europe to help with the storage refill before the next winter begins.

But prices have eased over the past few weeks, as talks began on a potential Russia-Ukraine ceasefire and as the winter in the northern hemisphere is coming to an end. The EU leaders are also discussing making the EU targets for gas storage refill by November 1 more flexible, which could ease some of the concerns about the pace of refills from April onwards.

A group of EU member states, including the biggest economies Germany and France, are reportedly arguing that to avoid price spikes and market speculation, the bloc should allow more flexibility in its currently binding 90% full-storage target by November 1 each year.  }

In the wake of the 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine and the halt to Russian pipeline gas supply to most EU countries, the European Commission adopted a target for EU natural gas storage levels to be 90% full by November 1 of each year.

However, this rigid November 1 target has created problems for many market players. Policymakers in countries including Germany, Italy, and the Netherlands are concerned that the current high forward gas prices for the summer months would make it unprofitable for gas companies and marketers to store gas.

With EU storage depleted at the fastest pace in seven years after a cold winter, the summer refill season presents several challenges in availability, prices, and the money that Europe will have to spend on additional LNG.

At a meeting last week, some EU energy ministers “mentioned the need for flexibility as regards the proposed gas storage regulation, which is currently being discussed, as well as for a rigorous impact assessment of the rules,” the EU said.

Despite the possible easing of the refill targets, the gas market will remain tight in the coming months, Moutaz Altaghlibi, senior energy economist at ABN AMRO Bank, said last week.

By Tsvetana Paraskova – Mar 24, 2025.

Terminal operator demands lease extension

ISLAMABAD: Engro Vopak Terminal Limited (EVTL) has pressed the government to extend the lease of land for a liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) and liquid chemical terminal at Port Qasim to enable it to continue operations.

The government had allocated a piece of land to EVTL at Port Qasim in 1995 and its lease is going to expire in 2026. Now, EVTL is urging the government to extend the lease. However, the Ministry of Maritime Affairs has refused to extend the lease and plans to float a tender for a fresh lease.

EVTL claims it has spent $100 million and intends to continue investing in the project if the government extends the lease agreement.

Interestingly, the extension in lease is not part of the agreement; therefore the maritime affairs ministry is reluctant to endorse it.

Sources said that the Port Qasim Authority (PQA) could not extend the lease of land and it would have to float a tender under the Public Procurement Regulatory Authority (PPRA) rules.

Besides the LPG and liquid chemical terminal, a liquefied natural gas (LNG) pipeline also passes through this land that connects an LNG terminal owned by Engro with Sui Southern Gas Company’s network.

Sources said that the matter was taken up in a recent meeting of the Special Investment Facilitation Council (SIFC). The SIFC had set a deadline for the Petroleum Division to complete negotiations with EVTL.

The PQA informed the government about the initiation of another round of negotiations with EVTL by signing the second Supplemental Implementation Agreement on January 15, 2025.

It emphasised that a third-party business valuation of the terminal was necessary, which required additional time. The PQA was of the view that the deadline of January 31, 2025 could not be met due to the extensive due diligence required in the process.

It requested an extension in the deadline to assist in the independent valuation of assets. The government granted extension of another 30 days (until March 2) for finalising ongoing negotiations with EVTL through signing the third Supplemental Agreement. It decided that the Finance Division would facilitate the PQA by providing services for the independent evaluation of assets.

The EVTL terminal for bulk liquid chemicals and LPG is part of Vopak’s global network of 78 terminals across 23 countries with total capacity of 36.2 million cubic metres. A joint venture between Royal Vopak (the Netherlands) and Engro Corporation, it has provided storage and terminal services since 1997. Engro Vopak handles over 50% of Pakistan’s LPG marine imports and supports major chemical industries by delivering key products like phosphoric acid, paraxylene and ethylene. Its LPG storage capacity had been expanded to 6,700 MT in 2012, with total storage now at 82,400 cubic metres.


By: Zafar Bhutta / March 02, 2025

S&P: Energy Cleantech Spending to Outpace Oil and Gas

A report from S&P Global Commodity Insights looks at clean energy technology trends for 2025.

It predicts a transformative year for the cleantech sector with investments outpacing fossil fuels for the first time.

Edurne Zoco, Executive Director of Clean Energy Technology at S&P Global Commodity Insights, says: “S&P Global Commodity Insights forecasts that cleantech energy supply investments, including renewable power generation, green hydrogen production and carbon capture and storage (CCS), will reach US$670bn in 2025, marking the first time these investments will outpace projected upstream oil and gas spending.

“Solar PV is expected to represent half of all cleantech investments and two-thirds of installed megawatts.”

Supply chain tensions and rebalancing

The cleantech sector is experiencing a saturation of Chinese-manufactured equipment, affecting the global pricing structure within the solar, wind and battery domains.

Despite potential price stabilisation by 2025, Chinese competition is slated to maintain low market prices.

Nonetheless, a rebalancing act is anticipated, with projections suggesting a decline in China’s market share in PV module production to 65% and battery cell manufacturing to 61% by 2030.

This evolution presents both challenges and opportunities, demanding strategic foresight from supply chain professionals.

The importance of battery energy storage is becoming increasingly significant in enhancing the economics of projects within regions with substantial penetration of renewable energy.

Effective integration of battery storage solutions is essential for managing both viability and price volatility in renewable projects.

AI’s impact on clean energy supply chains

Clearly, AI is transforming the cleantech sector, particularly in forecasting and grid planning. 

Eduard Sala de Vedruna, Head of Research, Energy Transition, Sustainability & Services at S&P Global Commodity Insights, explains: “The new year is not only bringing to the clean energy sector significant transformations that are reshaping energy production and consumption, but it promises to be pivotal for the clean energy sector, with significant advancements in corporate clean energy procurement and the integration of AI in energy management.”

AI-powered applications are emerging as critical tools for risk mitigation in energy supply chains, addressing discrepancies between forecast and actual energy generation.

Data centres are also expected to play a more significant role.

Expected to source approximately 300 TWh of clean power annually by 2030, they are becoming pivotal in driving demand for renewable energy, especially in North America.

Decarbonisation and supply chain innovation

The pursuit of deep decarbonisation is requiring innovation across the supply chains.

With ammonia increasingly becoming fundamental to low-carbon hydrogen production and the CCS sector on track to secure significant CO₂ capture capacity by 2025, the cleantech sector is poised for considerable advancements.

For supply chain managers, staying abreast of these developments is crucial for navigating the complexities of the ongoing energy transition effectively.

By Jasmin Jessen, Energy Digital / February 17, 2025

Insights Global / PJK International successfully completed 2nd independent assurance review of ARA CPP and Rhine Barge Freight Rate benchmark prices

Insights Global / PJK International has successfully concluded its second external assurance review of its benchmark prices for ARA CPP and Rhine Barge Freight Rates.

The independent review, conducted by an external auditing firm, assessed the policies and processes used by Insights Global / PJK International to evaluate oil product transportation costs via inland barges in Northwest Europe.

These policies and processes were developed in alignment with the Principles for Price Reporting Agencies (PRAs) established by the International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) in October 2012.

Recognized by the G20 in November 2012, the IOSCO PRA Principles have been incorporated into the EU Benchmark Regulation (BMR).

These principles set comprehensive standards for governance, quality, integrity, control, and conflict management for commodity benchmark price assessments.

Compliance with these standards requires annual external audits. Insights Global’s price assessment methodologies and policies are available here.

The audit report can be provided upon request.

LNG market faces supply strains

The IEA’s Q3 2024 report highlights supply constraints, Asian demand growth and rising freight rates reshaping global LNG trade and shipping dynamics

The latest IEA Gas Market Report for Q3 2024 presents a mixed picture of the global LNG market, characterised by supply constraints, volatile prices and growing demand centred around Asia.

The report outlines that LNG production underperformed in Q2 2024, while Asian demand surged, reshaping global LNG trade flows. These shifts, in turn, are having a profound impact on LNG shipping and freight rates.

In the first half of 2024, LNG supply growth slowed considerably, increasing by a mere 2% year-on-year. This marked the first contraction in LNG production since the global Covid-19 lockdowns in 2020.

According to the IEA, “LNG output fell by 0.5% in Q2 2024, driven by a combination of feed gas supply issues and unexpected outages.”

This shortfall was particularly evident in the United States, where production challenges at key liquefaction plants such as Freeport LNG hampered growth.

Similarly, African LNG supply contracted due to declining production in Egypt, where exports plummeted by 75% during the first half of the year.

Despite these supply challenges, the LNG market saw a surge in demand from Asia.

The IEA notes, “Asia accounted for around 60% of the increase in global gas demand in the first half of 2024,” with China and India leading the growth.

China’s LNG imports increased by 18%, setting the country on a trajectory to surpass its previous record for annual LNG imports. India followed closely, with a 31% rise in LNG imports, driven by lower spot prices.

These increases in demand have resulted in a reallocation of global LNG cargoes, redirecting flows away from Europe and towards Asian markets, leading to longer shipping routes and increased pressure on LNG freight rates.

The sharp rise in Asian demand comes at a time when European LNG imports have notably declined. Europe’s LNG intake fell by nearly 20% in the first half of 2024, a trend driven by lower demand, high storage levels, and an increase in piped gas deliveries.

As the report highlights, “The share of LNG in Europe’s total primary gas supply fell from 39% in H1 2023 to 33% in H1 2024.”

This reduction has been further exacerbated by geopolitical uncertainties surrounding Russian piped gas supplies, which continue to add volatility to the market. The redirection of LNG cargoes from Europe to Asia is shifting trade patterns and impacting shipping logistics, with carriers needing to optimise for longer voyages to meet the surging Asian demand.

Price volatility has also become a hallmark of the LNG market in 2024. While gas prices fell to precrisis levels during the first quarter of the year, they rebounded sharply in the second quarter due to tighter supply-demand fundamentals.

“Natural gas prices increased across all key markets in Q2 2024,” according to the IEA report.

This resurgence in prices has impacted LNG freight rates, with the demand for shipping services rising in tandem with increased Asian demand and extended shipping routes.

The need for more LNG carriers to meet these shifting market dynamics is likely to push up spot charter rates, adding further complexity to the global LNG shipping sector.

Looking ahead, LNG supply is expected to improve in the second half of 2024, with new liquefaction projects coming online in the United States and West Africa.

The IEA forecasts “Year-on-year growth in LNG supply is expected to accelerate during the second half of 2024.”

Notable capacity expansions include the Freeport LNG expansion and the start-up of the Tortue FLNG facility off the coast of West Africa. According to the latest IEA report, the LNG facility developments are anticipated to ease some of the supply pressures that have constrained the market and the anticipated rise in exports from new projects will be welcome news for LNG shipping companies.

The interplay between supply constraints and demand growth in Asia presents both opportunities and challenges for LNG shipping. While new liquefaction capacity will help address some of the supply issues, the market remains tight, and freight rates are expected to remain elevated due to the longer voyages required to serve the booming Asian markets.

The IEA’s outlook underscores the need for flexibility within the LNG shipping sector, as carriers must adapt to evolving trade routes and fluctuating market conditions.

As the IEA notes, “The limited increase in global LNG supply will restrain growth in import markets,” particularly in Europe, which continues to see declining demand.

By Rivieramm , Craig Jallal / 07 Oct 2024.